From DC Bureau
"The United States deliberately allowed Japan access to the United States’ most secret nuclear weapons facilities while it transferred tens of billions of dollars worth of American tax paid research that has allowed Japan to amass 70 tons of weapons grade plutonium since the 1980s, a National Security News Service investigation reveals. These activities repeatedly violated U.S. laws regarding controls of sensitive nuclear materials that could be diverted to weapons programs in Japan. The NSNS investigation found that the United States has known about a secret nuclear weapons program in Japan since the 1960s, according to CIA reports."
read more
Should we believe this account about 70 tons of weapons grade plutonium to be anything more than carefully constructed artificial propaganda that has been spread to believing researchers by some government department? Is it an attempt to 'justify' what has happened to Japan, Stuxnet virus and all, as if they were asking for Fukushima to happen by supposedly having this plutonium, so it did happen, and it is all their fault for trying to develop a nuclear arsenal bigger than 'China India and Pakistan combined'. Does anyone really think that after the Americans hammered the Japanese with nuclear weapons that the Americans would almost immediately start to build Japan into a nuclear armed superpower. Methinks this is not truly plausible. After all, look at how the German people were completely hammered down after the war and still are. Is it really likely that America would trust a former enemy who they had attacked so incredibly viciously by arming them in such an incredibly powerful way?
ReplyDeleteSo we have the word of the Americans that they captured a U boat that had been destined for Japan, laden with 1,200 pounds of uranium; well the Americans can say anything they want, they won the war and can make all sorts of lies up to minimise the alarming truth of the vast magnitude of their war crimes, by saying that they only just stopped some terrible catastrophe by the Japanese and the Germans involving nuclear weapons, as the Americans were naturally eager to confabulate a reasonable enough sounding excuse for the war crimes of their atomic weapons testing on live populations of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, whilst the Japanese were already suing for peace before their use; in the light of this, there was no true justification for using those bombs in the first place.
No one mentions the fact that Germany was never developing any atomic weapons, after all, this would spoil the story. Consider the following account that Hitler totally forbade any development of such a weapon:
http://www.nordisk.nu/showthread.php?t=17575&s=5286e898a1a962761c945e7fe14ab312
Compare this with evidence that such a weapon was already fully designed and patented in England in 1934. Leo Tzilard, a Hungarian Jewish atomic scientist, made the first practical design for a fully functioning atomic bomb, and patented the design in 1934 in England, after first coming up with the idea for the design in 1933:
http://inventors.about.com/od/sstartinventors/p/Leo_Szilard.htm
Why do people not consider that wartime nuclear materials could not have been destined merely for energy plants to supply the energy needs of Germany and Japan without any intention to develop any atomic explosive devices, as Hitler had already completely forbidden any such weaponry being developed by his scientists, so it is most definitely highly unlikely and highly improbable that after banning such research, that he would then have weapons grade materials to give to Japan. Just as heavy water was developed by the Germans for use as an energy source, so it is used today in Argentina and Norway without any involvement in making nuclear weapons, and is used purely for the purpose of making energy.
This being understood, I fail to see why Germany and Japan, who both suffered crippling oil embargoes, should not have been aiming to produce energy for their civilian populations, factories, and industrial plants, as well as electricity for their armed forces bases, (though atomic energy could not have been intended by Germany to produce explosive atomic devices, as Otto Skorzeny proved), and quite probably to power military vehicles if atomic powered engines could be developed, such as the US and Russia use today to power their military and non military ships, such as ice-breakers.
(cont.)
ReplyDeleteSuch materials do not absolutley prove any agenda of atomic bomb making, otherwise we would have fanatics saying lets attack Norway and Argentina because they must be trying to make atomic bombs for world conquest. I strongly consider the line of thinking about Germany and Japan trying to make atomic bombs as wartime and post-wartime propaganda to provide an excuse for American crimes at Nagasaki and Hiroshima, mere wishful thinking that does not constitute a proveable or even likely truth.